America funding Al Qaida in Yemen

Failing to eradicate the al Qaida presence by force, Salah summoned the tribal chiefs

harboring al Qaida centers and through them offered to pay the Islamists to

the country. The bribe of an estimated $15-20 million was accepeted al Qaida leaders, presenting themselves to the Somali Al-Shebab Islamist rebels as emissaries of Al

Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), turned up in Somalia to scout suitable areas

under rebel control for new bases, their pockets well lined with US dollars to pay for

their lease.

Our counter-terror sources report that the al Qaida group, which is still traveling around Somalia, has no intention of liquidating its bastions in Yemen, but is using the windfall for expansion to Somalia.

On an Internet and radio address taped from his year-end vacation in Hawaii,

Obama offered his most detailed public account yet of the ties between Al Qaida

and bombing-attempt suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, saying it appeared

that a Yemen affiliate of the terror group "trained him, equipped him with those

explosives and directed him to attack that plane headed for America.

Meanwhile, Gen. David H. Petraeus, who oversees the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq,

arrived in Yemen on Saturday to meet with President Ali Abdullah Saleh and

announce that the United States will more than double its counterterrorism aid to

Yemen in the coming year. Yemen's government deployed several hundred extra

troops to two mountainous eastern provinces that are Al Qaida's main

strongholds in the country.

Obama U-Turn on Un Penalties on Iran

President Barack Obama has done away with two key elements of US-Israeli strategic

relations: His administration has given up on stiff UN Security Council sanctions on

Iran over its nuclear drive, and gone back on the longstanding American commitment

assuring Israel of recognized and defensible borders in any future accommodation

with its Arab neighbors.
In the administration's message of congratulations to Israel on its 62nd Day of

Independence, US Secretary of state Hillary Clinton mentions "recognized

borders" while omitting the traditional "defensible."

Washington sources report that following the talks held by Presidents Obama and

Hu Jintao in Washington last week, the Administration is apparently engaged in a

debate about whether to push for tough sanctions against Iran at the Security Council

and run into opposition from China and other countries - or go for a quick UN General

Assembly resolution, which would be non-binding.The view William Burns, Under

Secretary of State for Political Affairs, offered the House foreign affairs committee

last week was that a UN resolution would clear the way for the European Union and other countries to "amplify the impact" of whatever sanctions are agreed on.

Burns avoided mentioning the Security Council and indicated that the administration

had little hope of any effective action on Iran by the world body.

It will be recalled that President Obama twice asked Israel to ignore Iran's missed

deadlines and promised to promote effective UN Security Council sanctions if Iran

continued to spurn his diplomatic efforts for curbing its nuclear program.The last

deadline was in December, 2009.
Yet on Monday, April 19, clearly lagging behind events in Washington, Israel's

defense minister Ehud Barak said: "Now is the time for sanctions (against Iran)."

He was answering questions in a radio interview on Israel's annual day of

mourning for its fallen servicemen.

Neither he nor any other Israeli leader commented on an equally serious setback

for Israel in Washington, which emerge from a conspicuous omission in Clinton's

message of congratulations for Israel's Independence Day, which is celebrated

Monday night and Tuesday:
"I have a deep personal commitment to Israel," she said. "And so does President

Obama. Our nation will not waver in protecting Israel’s security and promoting

Israel’s future. That is why pursuing peace and recognized borders for Israel

is one of our top priorities."

By omitting "defensible borders" from her message, she spoke for the first US

administration to abdicate its guarantee of defensible borders as a fundamental

component of Israel's security, thereby nullifying her and the US president's

pledge not to "waver in protecting Israel's security." This key omission led to

another worrying question about Israel's future borders: By whom must they

be recognized in the view of the Obama administration?

New Place For Al-Qaida,Yemen

The British embassy in the Yemeni capital of Sanaa closed its doors after one or more al Qaeda suicide bombers attacked the ambassador's convoy outside the heavily fortified building and its gunmen were repelled by embassy guards. According to first reports, one person was killed, but Ambassador Tim Torlot is safe.

Counter-terror sources report that the security situation in the Red Sea republic has deteriorated substantially despite the Yemeni offensive to crush al Qaeda strongholds in the country backed by US and British military and intelligence strength. One cause,

according to intelligence sources, is the extra boost al Qaeda gained from US funds

which Yemen president Abdullah Ali Salah secretly diverted to the Islamists in the

mistaken hope that they would remove their bases from Yemen and relocate in Somalia.

Failing to eradicate the al Qaeda presence by force, Salah summoned the tribal

chiefs harboring al Qaeda centers and through them offered to pay the Islamists to

leave the country. The bribe of an estimated $15-20 million was accepted al Qaeda leaders, presenting themselves to the Somali Al-Shebab Islamist rebels as emissaries of Al Qaeda

in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), turned up in Somalia to scout suitable areas under rebel control for new bases, their pockets well lined with US dollars to pay for their lease.

Our counter-terror sources report that the al Qaeda group, which is still traveling

around Somalia, has no intention of liquidating its bastions in Yemen, but is using the

windfall for expansion to Somalia.

US intelligence has long been aware of the operational and logistic ties between AQAP and

the Somali movement. Investigation of the failed Detroit-bound airliner bombing last

Christmas by the Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab disclosed that he set out on

his suicide mission from Somalia, not Yemen, as previously reported, and there

too he picked up the elements of the explosive charge hidden in his pants.

The attack on the British diplomatic convoy in Sanaa was not unexpected. Some days

ago, the Foreign Office issued an advisory against travel to Yemen "due to the high

threat of terrorism, kidnapping and tribal violence against western and

British interests."

Palestinain willing to renew peace Talks.

Authority Chairman, Mahmud Abbas stated that he is

willing to go back to negotiations with Israel, without pre-conditions, if the Arab League's monitoring committee session on May 1 approves. "Try me," he said in an exclusive

interview with Israel Channel 2 TV's Ehud Yaari. Abbas appears to have changed

direction after 15 months of stalling against US efforts to restart the talks on one

pretext or another. The US Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, who left the

Middle East announced he was returning to the region to

continue his mission , which is three days after the Arab

League meeting.
In answer to a question, Abbas said he had nothing against Binyamin Netanyahu

and is ready to talk to him. He is Israel's elected leader, said Abbas, and has a

parliamentary majority.
He stressed that certain issues had been agreed and settled in talks with Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert and Tzipi Livni, then foreign minister. One of those issues was security in the areas to be handed over to the Palestinian state. It had been agreed

that NATO personnel under US command would be deployed in the West Bank

and along the Jordan River, he said.
Settlement blocs and territory swaps would be subject to negotiation between the

Palestinians and Israel, said Abbas, and a solution could also be found for the

Palestinian refugee problem.Asked about Palestinian Prime Minister Salam

Fayad's pledge to establish a Palestinian state by 2011, Abbas said clearly: "We are

against unilateral steps."
Regarding the future of the Gaza Strip, he said there had been good progress in the

quest for reconciliation between his Fatah movement and Hamas.
Last Friday, the Palestinian leader speaking to his Fatah party appealed to President

Barack Obama to "Impose a solution" of the Middle East conflict. He rejected out

of hand a new Israeli proposal of temporary borders for a Palestinian state on 60

percent of the West Bank.
In the meantime, the Obama administration met Israel halfway on its demand for a

construction freeze in East Jerusalem, accepting that Israel would quietly suspend

building licenses and other permits for just four weeks, giving Mitchell a chance to

persuade Abbas to joint US-moderated talks with Israel.

Israel Could use Ballistic Missile against Iran

Ballistic missiles could be Israel's weapon of choice against Iranian nuclear facilities if it decides on a pre-emptive attack and deems air strikes too risky, according to a report by a Washington think-tank. Israel is widely assumed to have Jericho missiles capable of hitting Iran with an
accuracy of a few dozen metres (yards) from target. Such a capability would be free of warplanes' main drawbacks -- limits on fuel and ordnance, and perils to pilots.
Extrapolating from analyst assessments that the most advanced Jerichos carry 750 kg
(1,650 lb) conventional warheads, Abdullah Toukan of the Center for Strategic and International Studies said 42 missiles would be enough to "severely damage or demolish"
Iran's core nuclear sites at Natanz, Esfahan and Arak.
"If the Jericho III is fully developed and its accuracy is quite high then this scenario
could look much more feasible than using combat aircraft," he said in the March 14 report,
titled "Study on a Possible Israeli Strike on Iran's Nuclear Development Facilities".Israel,
whose jets bombed Iraq's nuclear reactor in 1981 and mounted a similar sortie over Syria in 2007, has hinted that it could forcibly deny Iran the means to make an atomic bomb.
But many experts believe the Iranian sites are too distant, dispersed and protected
for Israel's warplanes to take on alone.Israel neither confirms nor denies having Jerichos, as part of an "ambiguity" policy veiling its own assumed atomic arsenal.
Sam Gardiner, a retired U.S. air force colonel who runs war games for various government agencies in Washington, cast doubt on the usefulness of ballistic missiles against Iran,
noting, for example, the robust fortification at Natanz.This, he said, would required that attackers "burrow" into the targets using multiple, precision-guided bombs
dropped by plane: "The American conclusion is that the only way to get deep enough
is to put a second warhead into the hole of the first."
Loath to see further destabilisation of a combustible region, the Obama administration
has championed engaging Iran diplomatically. Some U.S. officials have signalled
unhappiness at the idea of Israel going it alone against its arch-foe.
Reprisals.
Tukan said a Jericho salvo could draw an Iranian counter-attack with Shehab missiles.
Other reprisal scenarios include Iran choking off oil exports, hitting U.S. Gulf assets,
or ordering proxy attacks on Jewish targets abroad.
Some Israeli experts have been dismissive of the Shehab threat, citing intelligence
assessments that Iran has deployed fewer than 100 of the missiles and that, if fired,
most would be destroyed in mid-flight by Israel's Arrow II interceptor. "Under such circumstances, we would expect little more than a repeat of the Gulf war," said one
-general, referring to Iraq's firing of 40 Scud missiles at Israel during
the 1991 conflict. Those attacks inflicted damage but few casualties.
The Arrow II also provides some protection for Jordan, an Arab neighbour of
and which Toukan saw becoming "Ground Zero if a ballistic missile
exchange takes place".
He noted that any Jericho strikes on Iran -- which has denied seeking nuclear
weapons but vowed to retaliate if attacked -- would be complicated should
Tehran obtain the most sophisticated version of Russia's S-300 air-defence system,
which can tackle ballistic missiles as well as invading planes. Israel could face a
further difficulty in mounting a sneak Jericho attack because its strategic air bases
are located near population centres. The unannounced test launch of what was
believed to be a Jericho III outside Tel Aviv last year became public knowledge
within minutes.
But that may be the extent of Iran's forewarning. According to an Israeli defence
consultant, only the United States and Russia have put up satellites capable of
spotting ballistic missile launches in real time, "and it's highly unlikely that the
Iranians would get access to that information".The consultant, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity, played down the notion of ballistic missiles being used for
conventional attacks: "You look at any major Western military, and you'll see that
such strikes are the purview of manned warplanes, while ballistic missiles are
reserved for nuclear-strike scenarios."
But despite of all these facts and figure it is not going to be easy for them to do so alone.

sanctions Tradeoff Against Iran

Chinese president Hu indicated a willingness to consider abstaining on a UN security council vote imposing sanctions against Iran - if the United States reciprocated by withholding its

vote on sanctions against Israel over its construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. sources report that US president Barack Obama did not reject the idea out of hand when it

was raised in his hour-long telephone conversation with President Hu Thursday, April 1.
They decided to talk again about a coordinated, tit-for-tat US-Chinese sanctions deal with regard to Israel and Iran when they meet at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington

on April 12-13. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was invited to the conference; Iranian leaders were not. After the Obama-Hu phone conversation, the foreign ministry in Beijing delivered the Chinese president's consent to attend the summit. His reply was delayed

to signal displeasure over US arms sales to Taiwan and Obama's White House welcome for the Dalai Lama. It would be the first time a US president has come close to considering withholding his veto from an anti-Israel resolution at the Security Council. This implied willingness

may have been partly responsible for breaking the ice in Sino-US relations.According to our Middle East sources, White House officials dealing with Arab governments were quick to pass the word around of the evolving Obama approach. They tied it in with the US president's

special envoy George Mitchell's new plan to push for a negotiated Israel-Palestinian deal

on the borders of a Palestinian state to be struck within four months. Mitchell arrives in Jerusalem on April 12 - shortly before the Israeli prime minister is due to take off for Washington.
The two combined US steps add up to a further widening of the Obama

distance from Jerusalem, a rift which may even lead at some point to his

parallel condemnatory sanctions against Israel and Iran. He is determined to force the Netanyahu government to bow to Washington's say-so on issues vital to Israel's security,

namely the Iranian nuclear threat and its claim to secure borders.Beijing's turnabout on sanctions against Iran brought Saeed Jalili, the director of Iran's National Security Council, running to Beijing Thursday to demand explanations. The US president's openness

to Beijing's proposed sanctions trade belies the outreach his aide Dan Shapiro,

National Security Council Middle East Senior Director, sought to achiieve in a

to Jewish community representatives Friday. He tried denying relations were in

crisis after Netanyahu's chilly welcome at the White House last month and insisted

that there had been more agreement than disagreement between the two leaders.

Washington sources report that the American-Jewish leaders addressed by Shapiro

received his message with extreme skepticism.

Iran, The New Nuclear Club Member.

Iran had plenty to celebrate on its National Nuclear Day Friday, April 9. President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad unveiled the new "third generation" centrifuge which he claimed
was capable of six times the speed of the machines in current use in Natanz and there
and then proclaimed Iran a nuclear power.
He had three more reasons to crow: 1. Iran's first atomic reactor at the southern
town of Bushehr began its main and final test at high temperatures after eight
months of test runs. If all the components of the Russian-built 1000-megawatt plant
work smoothly, the reactor will finally go into full operation in June or in August at
the latest after years of delays.
Mahmoud Jafari, who heads the project, said all parts are working well and there is
no reason why the plant should not start producing electricity before the end of this
year. On March 18, Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin also said Bushehr would
go on stream this summer. military sources report that the spent fuel rods from this
reactor will soon be providing Iran with an easy and plentiful source of
weapons-grade plutonium.
2. So too will the Arak heavy water plant which Iran has been building secretly southeast
of Tehran in violation of its Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations. Work there was
discovered this week to have advanced by leaps and bounds and brought the project
close to completion, against all estimates that the reactor would not be ready before
2015. Our military and intelligence sources note that Arak and Boushehr will combine
to provide Iran with the large quantities of plutonium for nuclear warheads. This fissile
material has advantages over enriched uranium in its accessibility from heavy water
and light water reactors, its smaller size for a nuclear explosion, and its use in smaller
and lighter nuclear warheads for delivery by smaller missiles.A former IAEA official,
John Carlson, once warned that large light water reactors "of the sort Iran is building
at Bushehr can produce 330 kilograms of near-weapons grade plutonium - enough to
make more than 50 crude nuclear bombs." The process of separating plutonium from
spent fuel "employs technology little more advanced," he said, "than that required for
producing dairy products or pouring concrete."3. Jafari also announced on the occasion of National Nuclear Day that Iran had uncovered in the central province of Yazd large new
deposits of uranium ore plentiful enough to make Iran independent of foreign imports
for both its military and civilian needs. political sources add: These three breakthroughs on Iran's road to a nuclear weapon are radical enough to put Tehran in the driving seat in negotiations with the 5+1 Group (five permanent UN Security Council members plus
Germany) over its illicit production of enriched uranium and their offer to process it
outside Iran as a compromise gesture. Iran has shown the world it no longer needs
outside help for reprocessing uranium up to the critical 20 percent level, which is a
short jump to weapons grade and the fissile core of a nuclear bomb. Tehran has made
good use of every second allowed by the US-led world powers' lame efforts to dissuade
it from its nuclear goals by means of partly-effective sanctions, attractive incentives and diplomatic engagement, a policy which gained momentum after Barack Obama became US president. Even this week, he was still telling Tehran that the door to diplomacy still stood open.

Idea behind Us Nuclear Summit

If Iran is attacked, nuclear devices will go off in American cities
This warning, along with an announcement that Iran would join the world's nuclear club
within a month, raised the pitch of Iranian anti-US rhetoric to a new high Tuesday, April
13, as 47 world leaders gathered in Washington for President Barack Obama's Nuclear
Security Summit. The statement published by Kayhan said: "If the US strikes Iran with
nuclear weapons, there are elements which will respond with nuclear blasts in the centers of America's main cities." For the first time, military sources report, Tehran indicated the possibility of passing nuclear devices to terrorists capable of striking inside the United States. Without specifying whether those elements would be Iranian or others, Tehran aimed at the heart of the Nuclear Security Summit by threatening US cities with nuclear terror. Iranians sources report that Tehran is playing brinkmanship to demonstrate that the Washington summit, from which Iran and North Korea were excluded, failed before it began, because terrorist elements capable of striking inside the US had already acquired nuclear devices
for that purpose. Although Iran has yet to attain operational nuclear arms, our military
sources believe it does possess the makings of primitive nuclear devices or "dirty bombs."
In an interview ahead of the summit, President Obama warned: "If there was ever a
detonation in New York City, or London, or Johannesburg, the ramifications... would be devastating."In another shot at the summit, Behzad Soltani, deputy director of Iran's
Atomic Commission, announced Tuesday: "Iran will join the world nuclear club within a
month in a bid to deter possible attacks on the country." He added: "No country would
even think about attacking Iran once it is in the club."
The Iranian official's boast was run by the Fars news agency, published by Iran's
Revolutionary Guards Corps.
Behzadi further pointed to the construction of 360 MW nuclear power plant and a 40
MW research reactor in Iran's central city of Arak, claiming the projects were 70 percent complete. This plant is generally believed to have been built to enable Iran to produce
weapons-grade plutonium as an alternative weapons fuel to highly-enriched uranium and material for radioactive weapons.Sunday, April 11, reported that Iran is making much
better progress than Western and Israeli intelligence estimates have held toward
completing the Arak heavy water reactor. Along with the strides made in its nuclear manufacturing capacity, Tehran's anti-US rhetoric has grown more strident in the past
week.
Iran's Armed Forces Chief of Staff Maj.Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi said if the United States
made any military moves on the Islamic Republic "
none of the American troops in the region would go back home alive." military sources
report the presence of app. 220,000 US soldiers in the countries around Iran, including
Gulf bases and waters, Iraq and Afghanistan. The Iranian general was reacting to US
defense secretary Robert Gates' warning that Washington's policy decision to limit the
use of nuclear arms if attacked did not apply to Iran and North Korea.
this all was the back ground of the new Us nuclear policy.

Does India Not Come Under American New Nuclear Policy.

President Barack Obama is making the prevention of nuclear terrorism a top goal of U.S. atomic policy and He also would limit the role of nuclear weapons in national defense.

He has issued new nuclear policy. in this policy report he has discussed about the nuclaer programs of Russia, China, Pakistan, Iran, North Korea.

He did not discussed about the India.

About Russia they reported.

Mr. Obama’s plan is to put new limits on the use of U.S. nuclear weapons. The policy review precedes the signing of a nuclear-arms treaty with Russia on securing nuclear weapons material and preventing the spread of such arms.

About China they said that

The report cites concerns about China’s stance on nuclear weapons even though the Chinese arsenal is much smaller than that of the U.S. and Russia.
“The lack of transparency surrounding its nuclear programs — their pace and scope, as well as the strategy and doctrine that guides them — raises questions about China’s future strategic intentions,” the report says.

About Iran and North Korea they reported in such a way.

Iran and North Korea are singled out in the report for violating “non-proliferation obligations” and defying the United Nations Security Council in their pursuit of nuclear weapons and missile systems to deliver nuclear payloads.
This policy contains a “very strong message” to Iran and North Korea should they launch an attack against the U.S. or its allies, and that “all options are on the table” for a U.S. response.

Issuing a Warning
A warning is also included to “proliferating states” that any attack on the U.S. or its allies will be defeated and any state’s use of nuclear weapons would be met with a response that is “effective and overwhelming.”

About pakistan they reported that

Pakistan nuclear Plan Is in strong Hands in pakistanis have made it in safe process.

But they told nothing about the India's Nuclear Program which is the most unsafe program in the whole world.Is there not a kind of diplomatic policy...................

Is there any way they have a civil nuclear agreement with India.

Is there any power in this world that dare to ask America that why you are not looking towords india's nuclear program.

To do the justice and for the fair play you should treat the All the Countries in the same way other wise unbalance of Power will take and it will be dangerous.

American new Nuclear policy.

A few days before American president obama Declared his new Nuclear policy about The World.

President Barack Obama is making the prevention of nuclear terrorism a top goal

U.S. atomic policy and He also would limit the role of nuclear weapons in national defense.
The president’s Nuclear Posture Review calls for “a broader approach to deterrence” than dependence primarily on the threat of a retaliatory nuclear strike, while warning of

dangers of nuclear technology spreading to terrorist groups.“The greatest threat to U.S. and global security is no longer a nuclear exchange between nations, but nuclear terrorism by

extremists and nuclear proliferation to an increasing number of states,” Obama said in a statement. “For the first time, preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism is now at the top of America’s nuclear agenda.”

Mr Obama’s plan is to put new limits on the use of U.S. nuclear weapons. The policy review precedes the signing of a nuclear-arms treaty with Russia on securing nuclear weapons

material and preventing the spread of such arms.
‘Balanced and Comprehensive’
A balanced and comprehensive approach” to making the U.S. more secure while also

steps toward Obama’s goal of reducing the number of nuclear weapons in the world.

While the policy de-emphasizes nuclear weapons as instruments of power, it says “

remains a narrow range of contingencies in which U.S. nuclear weapons may still play

role in deterring a conventional or chemical, biological attack against the United States

or its allies and partners.”

This policy contains a “very strong message” to Iran and North Korea should they launch an attack against the U.S. or its allies, and that “all options are on the table” for a U.S. response.

Issuing a Warning.

A warning is also included to “proliferating states” that any attack on the U.S. or its allies

will be defeated and any state’s use of nuclear weapons would be

The report cites concerns about China’s stance on nuclear weapons even though the Chinese arsenal is much smaller than that of the U.S. and Russia.

The Obama Said that Pakistani Nuclear program is in safe now and Pakistani Government has covered it.
“The lack of transparency surrounding its nuclear programs — their pace and scope, as well as the strategy and doctrine that guides them — raises questions about China’s future strategic intentions,” the report says.

Obama has called for the abolition of nuclear weapons. The review provides the

and the strategic framework to further that goal for the next 10 years..
The People says the administration will pursue discussions with Russia on further

reduction that could be “broader in scope” than those included in the most recent treaty.
Obama told that it is a “moral responsibility” to lead an effort to rid the world of nuclear weapons, .”
No New Nuclear Weapons.

The policy says no new weapons but what is this...........................................................

The new nuclear policy would seek to isolate countries that aren’t in compliance with non-proliferation obligations, an administration official who briefed reporters said. In the

review, Obama rejects the development of new nuclear weapons while increasing

efforts to modernize the current arsenal.
The review endorses keeping in place — albeit in smaller numbers — the U.S.

triad of submarine-launched D-5 Trident missiles, land-based missiles and heavy bombers.
And although the review focuses mostly on strategic nuclear weapons, it also says the

U.S. needs to retain a capability to launch if needed so-called “non-strategic

nuclear weapons.”

The Air Force, for example, is directed to eventually upgrade its new F-35 fighter to

carry both conventional and nuclear weapons.
Upgrading the Lockheed Martin Corp. F-35 to carry the B-61 nuclear bomb on aircraft deployed overseas is one of several initiatives the report outlines as important to reassuring allies of a U.S. commitment to nuclear deterrence.

Are American Leaving Afganistan?????

Today the question is

are Americans Soldiers Leaving Afganistan.

last month American President Came on a sudden and unscheduled tour in Afganistan.There he delievered a Speach to the Americans and native forces to encourage thier morals and ensures them that they are doing an excellent job for the United states of America and american People.

What the Fact under line is that the American And Western forces have fad up with this un attainable struggle against the wariers of the century.

Reports shows that rate of assination of American soldiers is increasing day by day by the Talibans and native peoples. this is creating a big desperation among the western soldiers.

almost 50% soldiers are about to mad they have reached in such a state that they are killing themselves. this is also causing great confusion among higher authorities.

Americans have reached in such a state that they are about to fly from Afganistan and will never come back.

The Loss and expenditure of America in Afganistan is also increasing day by day just like a big giant.

To tell you the Truth,
it's time for President Obama to reverse course and leave Afghanistan, as well as Iraq.
Leaving Afghanistan will not only relieve the explosive pressure inside Pakistan and give Islamabad a chance to restore order, it will also give Russia, Iran and India time to ponder what they will do in Americans absence. All three have far more at stake in the region than the United States does.

Are American Leaving Afganistan?????